Disclosure of Climate-related Financial Information Based on the TCFD Recommendations

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), formulated its recommendations for clarified, comparable, and consistent information disclosure regarding the risks and opportunities posed by climate change. These recommendations were announced in June 2017. Climate change is an issue to be addressed on a global scale. The effects of climate change have significant impacts on the lives of people, through changes in economic behaviors and society worldwide. The T&D Insurance Group has expressed its support for the TCFD recommendations, and is actively committed to disclosing climate-related financial information in an easy-to-understand manner.

Disclosure of climate-related financial information

Governance

Oversight by the Board of Directors

Role of Management

Strategies

*1 Business risks associated with natural disasters caused by extreme weather such as typhoons and floods, and those associated with phenomena such as an increase in the average temperature and a rise in the sea level

*2 Business risks arising from the actions of government, corporations, and consumers in the process of carrying out the transition to a low carbon/decarbonized society (through a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions)

Scenario analysis: What the World Looks Like Under Each Scenario

The world under the 1.5°C scenario The world under the 4°C scenario
■Premise
  • Strict measures are taken against global warming. By the end of the century, the average annual temperature will increase by between 1.0°C and 1.8°C.
■Overview
  • Due to the rise in average temperatures, natural disasters become more frequent and intense. (However, the impact is kept below a certain level.)
  • Strict measures to combat global warming increase business costs for each company.
  • Technology innovation progresses (and new players emerge) in support of low or net-zero carbon emissions.
  • Reallocation of investment away from companies that are unable to support low or net-zero carbon emissions.
■Reference scenario
  • Physical risk scenarios based on RCP2.6
  • Transition risk scenarios based on the Disorderly and Orderly categories of NGFS
■Premise
  • No measures are taken against global warming beyond the current status quo. By the end of the century, the average annual temperature will increase by between 3.3°C and 5.7°C.
■Overview
  • Due to the large rise in average temperatures, the impact of frequent and intense natural disasters becomes significant.
  • Sea level rise, storm surge, flooding, and heavy rainfall have a significant impact on coastal areas. (A review of lifestyle and BCP is also necessary. The companies face increased business costs.)
  • Reallocation of investment away from companies that are vulnerable to natural disasters.
■Reference scenario
  • Physical risk scenarios based on RCP8.5
  • Transition risk scenarios based on the Hot House World category of NGFS
↓
Physical effects caused by a rise in average temperature (1.5°C scenario < 4°C scenario)
[Acute]
  • Natural disasters such as typhoons and floods become more frequent and intense.
  • The number of injuries and fatalities due to natural disasters increases due to an increase in extreme weather events such as typhoons and floods.
[Chronic]
  • Rainfall and weather patterns change, and average temperatures and sea levels rise.
  • Increasing average temperatures lead to an increase in the number of heat stress deaths and heat stroke patients.
  • The risk of contracting an infectious disease increases due to the expansion of the habitats of disease vectors.
Impact of the transition to a society with low or net-zero carbon emissions (1.5°C scenario)
[Policies, laws, and regulations]
  • Tighter regulations on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the introduction of a carbon tax. Expanded disclosure requirements (increased business costs for companies).
[Technology development]
  • Progress in reducing the carbon footprint of existing technologies and the introduction of new technologies such as renewable energy, storage batteries, and electric vehicles.
  • While some companies emerge and grow by seizing new business opportunities, others have been unable to respond to low or net-zero carbon emissions measures and fail.
[Changes in investor behavior]
  • Reduced investment and lending to companies that cannot comply with regulations, companies that cannot exit from existing GHG emissions businesses, and companies that have recorded fossil fuels as stranded assets. Expanded investment and financing to companies that contribute to low or net-zero carbon emissions.

Scenario analysis: Impact on the Group and the Response Measures

1.5°C scenario 4°C scenario
Physical risks Impact on underwriting profitability
  • The number of heat stress deaths and heat stroke patients increases.
  • Both of these increases will be gradual over a long period of time, which will limit their impact on underwriting profitability.
  • This will be addressed by conducting an appropriate review of premium rates.
  • Significantly higher average temperatures will lead to larger increases in heat stress deaths and heat stroke patients than under the 1.5°C scenario.
  • Both of these increases will be gradual over a long period of time, but will be larger than under the 1.5°C scenario.
  • We will address this by conducting a more detailed review of premium rates to avoid a significant negative impact on underwriting profitability.
BCP response
  • A business continuity plan has been established at another site in case a major disaster causes a disruption to the functions of critical sites.
  • To address the increasing intensity of natural disasters, we will use hazard maps and similar tools to assess the risk level of our business sites, relocate important sites, establish backup sites, and implement remote decentralization measures using IT as appropriate.
Transition risks Impact on asset management income
  • In the medium-term time horizon, up to the middle of this century, some industries of the investees of the Group will be significantly affected due to tighter regulations on GHG emissions, the introduction of a carbon tax, the replacement of old technologies with new low or net zero carbon technologies, changes in consumer values and behaviors, etc.
  • To avoid damage to asset management income from the impact on the investees and borrowers of the Group, we will work as appropriate in accordance with the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) through the promotion of investment and financing activities to businesses and companies that contribute to the transition to a society with low or net-zero carbon emissions, for example renewable energy businesses, and through engagement with existing investees.
  • The medium-term impact on the investees and borrowers of the Group will be smaller, since there will be no sudden changes in the environment expected in the 1.5°C scenario.
  • However, in the long-term time horizon up to the end of the century, it is assumed that the increase in average temperatures and the intensification of natural disasters will have a significant negative physical impact on the business activities of each investee and borrower.
  • In order to avoid damage to our asset management income, we will avoid or withdraw investment and financing to firms with significant physical risks.

Reference data: Physical risk scenarios: RCP2.6 and RCP8.5, Transition risk scenarios: NGFS and Bank of England

Scenario analysis: Business Opportunities for the Group

More sophisticated climate change risk analysis: Quantitative analysis of effects on the Group

We collaborated with KPMG Consulting Co., Ltd. and the Japan Weather Association (called the JWA below) to conduct a quantitative analysis of effects on the Group in order to increase the sophistication of our climate change risk analysis.

Analysis method

  • The JWA developed a high-resolution climate scenario dataset by setting up a 1-km mesh for climate-change prediction data in order to analyze physical risks.
  • Next, two models were developed for the Group—one for estimating the number of victims of flooding and another for estimating the number of people hospitalized/fatalities due to heat exhaustion—assuming that Japan’s future average temperature increases by either 2°C (the RCP2.6 scenario) or 4°C (the RCP8.5 scenario) due to climate change. Five climate prediction models were utilized for our estimates.
  • We divided the future period up through 2100 into two periods, the near future period from 2026 to 2050 and the distant future period from 2051 to 2100, and then conducted a physical risk analysis.

Analysis results

Disaster victims

  • There is variation between regions in terms of future increases in rainfall (with rainfall decreasing in some regions).
  • In addition, although there will be an increased rate of powerful typhoons, the number of typhoons is expected to decrease.

⇒In both scenarios, although there is a possibility of a sudden spike in the number of disaster victims in the case of extremely heavy rainfall, the number during the entire period is about the same.

Number of people hospitalized/fatalities due to heat exhaustion

  • Regardless of the scenario, there is not that much of a change during the near future period.
  • During the distant future period, the number of extremely hot days and tropical nights will increase. In particular, in the RCP8.5 scenario, the number of extremely hot days is expected to increase by more than a month compared to the present.

⇒In both scenarios, the number of people hospitalized/fatalities due to heat exhaustion is expected to increase during the distant future period.

Effects on the Company

  • According to our calculations based on our analysis results, in the case of the RCP8.5 scenario—which has a greater effect—compared to the base period (2006 to 2025), both insurance claims and benefits will increase in the distant future period by ¥510 million to ¥1.63 billion (equivalent to approximately 0.1% to 0.3% of the Group’s paid out insurance claims and benefits).

* The graph below shows the average of all five models. (Increase of ¥1.07 billion in the distant future period)

graph:Monetary effect: RCP8.5 scenario (¥100 million). 2051 to 2100, Heat exhaustion fatalities, Persons hospitalized due to heat exhaustion, Disaster fatalities, Total17.71

Risk management

Risk Identification and Assessment Process

Risk Management Process

Management of climate change-related risks

1) Physical risks

  • The Group considers to mitigate deterioration of underwriting profitability through reinsurance and other means, along with large-scale disaster risks (insurance underwriting risks).
  • The Group monitors existing products and implements countermeasures, including product revisions, as necessary.

2) Transition risks

  • The Group engages in investments and borrowings, taking into account climate change-related risks based on the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI).
  • The Group monitors trends in economic policies, laws, and regulations, and share the information across the Group, through the Group Sustainability Promotion Committee and the Group Management Promotion Committee. Measures are taken to ensure that the Group responds to such trends in a sufficiently effective manner at the level expected of a listed company.

Metrics and targets

Roadmap to achieving net zero

figure:Roadmap to achieving net zero SCOPE1,2 2025 Reduction of 40%. SCOPE3 2030 Reduction of 40%. Promotion of renewable energy 2030 60% renewable energy.

CO2 emissions reduction target

Subject Targets
Own emissions
(Scope 1 and 2)
FY2025: 40% reduction (compared to FY2013)
FY2050: Net zero
Investees and borrowers
(Scope 3: category 15)
FY2030: 40% reduction (compared to FY2020)

* Subjects are stocks, corporate bonds, and financing of domestic listed companies.

FY2050: Net zero

Promotion of renewable energy introduction